Late update
Massive display of longitudinal interferometers?
UFO Fleet Taped
Over Bedhampton, England
Is this sighting a case of the testing of all the Russian (KGB) longitudinal interferometers at once? And coordinating their targeting through the woodpecker grid to a common place, as an exercise in making a massive scalar attack upon a given region? Was this a confluence of Russian Tesla howitzer marker-beacons?
Certainly for a massive all-out scalar attack you would want coordinated movements of the target areas of many howitzers at once, for you could then just cut a bloody swath across a wide area, all the howitzer blasts marching across the land in a kind of scalar version of the "scorched-earth policy." All in a line, blasting, and heat, and mind waves. Or you might want to put the blasts all in the same place for a truly horrendous destruction. And on top of that biowar on citizens whose immune systems have been weakened with the quantum potenial weapons. This is the latest version of Armageddon.
And should any madmen gain control of these weapons, any rogue group at all, and should they have some aggenda to radically depopulate the world, to simply kill by the billion, the means will be in their hands to do so.
Update: MEG patent granted
Motionless Electromagnetic Generator
Patent GrantedThis message is fromJean-Louis Naudin, the French scientist who successfully replicated the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator (MEG) in France. He announces the granting of the patent to the MEG Builder's group at Yahoo.
----- Original Message -----
From: jnaudin509@aol.com
To: jlnlabs@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:20 PM
Subject: [jlnlabs] (Info) GOOD NEWS : The Tom Bearden's MEG IS PATENTED
Dear ALL,
GOOD NEWS !!!!
The Motionless Electromagnetic Generator
from Tom Bearden is now PATENTED
US 6362718 granted on March 26, 2002
US Patent 6,362,718 :
Motionless Electromagnetic Generator ( MEG )
Abstract: An electromagnetic generator without moving parts includes a permanent magnet and a magnetic core including first and second magnetic paths. A first input coil and a first output coil extend around portions of the first magnetic path, while a second input coil and a second output coil extend around portions of the second magnetic path. The input coils are alternatively pulsed to provide induced current pulses in the output coils. Driving electrical current through each of the input coils reduces a level of flux from the permanent magnet within the magnet path around which the input coil extends. In an alternative embodiment of an electromagnetic generator, the agnetic core includes annular spaced-apart plates, with posts and permanent magnets extending in an alternating fashion between the plates. An output coil xtends around each of these posts. nput coils extending around portions of the plates are pulsed to cause the induction of current within the output coils.
Inventors: Patrick; Stephen L. (2511 Woodview Dr. SE., Huntsville, AL 35801); Bearden; Thomas E. (2211 Cove Rd., Huntsville, AL 35801); Hayes; James C. (16026 Deaton Dr. SE., Huntsville, AL 35803); Moore; Kenneth D. (1704 Montdale Rd., Huntsville, FL 35801); Kenny; James L. (925 Tascosa Dr., Huntsville, AL 35802)Appl. No.: 656313
Filed: September 6, 2000
For some technical info see my web site at : http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/meg.htm
Best Regards
Jean-Louis Naudin
Email: JNaudin509@aol.com
Main Web site : http://jlnlabs.org
Site France : http://jlnlabs.multimania.com
Patent Story on Rense.com:
Important Note 2006! MEG delayed: Click here for a current status history of the MEG from Tom Bearden
Rense.com
MEG Scalar Energy Device
Patented - Production Starts Next Year
From Bill Morgan
3-28-2Patent was granted on March 26, 2002 for "The Motionless Magnetic Generator," (MEG) US Patent 6,362,718, which is likely to become the first commercially available free energy device in history in about one year from now. The machine will provide free electricity from the vacuum, for the life of the device, which should be a very long life since it has no moving parts. You can see a picture of scientist Jean-Louis Naudin's MEG replication model at: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/meg.htm.
It has strong magnets, coils, and a controller unit with the electronics. Naudin made the announcement to the MEG-builder's Yahoo group. The announcement has significance since the patent office has always been skeptical of devices which seem to "get-something-for-nothing." But according to the new science of scalar electromagnetics, the MEG does not break the law of conservation of energy. It's just that the energy is conserved in the fourth dimension, time, and not our 3-space world.
The MEG provides electrical energy by tapping the longitudinal electromagnetic (EM) waves which exist in almost infinite abundance in the vacuum of space. This ocean of energy which permeates everything is sometimes called the "zero point" energy, since it remains there even at absolute zero temperature.
Four inventors are listed: Stephen L. Patrick, Thomas E. Bearden, James C. Hayes, Kenneth D. Moore.
Tom Bearden has explained the operation of the MEG on his website Cheniere.org, and also speaks about the new fearful weapons that can and have been made using the same "longitudinal waves" of the vacuum.
The complicated physics of how the MEG works is explained in the paper "The Motionless Electromagnetic Generator: Extracting Energy from a Permanent Magnet with Energy Replenishment from the Active Vacuum," which can be found at Tom Bearden's website:
cheniere.org.(http://www.help4all.de/energy/MEGpaper.pdf)
The first MEG units to be produced for sale will output 2.5 kilowatts of free electricity. Forever. They should be in production about a year from now. Facilities for manufacturing the device are being set up in an unnamed "friendly nation."
This free electricity will flow indefinitely, without much, or any maintenance. The units may be hooked together to provide more wattage, so four of them would provide 10 kilowatts. After some production experience units will be made which output 10 kilowatts each. With a couple of those units a house could get off the electrical grid.
Tom Bearden, one of the inventors has said "I will admit that the chief scientist of an important experimental group in a large company was rather stunned at the type of output we were able to obtain. The MEG may look like just a transformer, but it is not. It is a completely different breed of cat." This cat, it would seem, is out of the bag now.
The ordinary EM waves we are familiar with are called "transverse" waves, to distinguish them from the new "longitudinal" EM waves of the vacuum. Bearden has explained in depth on his website cheniere.org that wherever there is a dipole (battery, generator, magnet) there is an unseen flow of longitudinal EM waves in that local vacuum, the only problem is in tapping that energy and "transducing" it to electricity. Bearden says that the problem with all the electrical circuits we have is that they are two-wire circuits, a loop by which half the energy goes back to destroy the dipole. In the MEG that closed loop is never made. So the dipole is not being destroyed.
Patents are not granted on devices which do not work, so in a sense this announcement proclaims a new era. The MEG device itself proclaims and proves that energy is abundantly available everywhere, for free. We only have to build the devices to tap it. MEG type devices could be put into a car with an electric engine to make a truly fuel-less automobile. Electricity can be available in very remote places. People will be able to get off our very terrorist-vulnerable power grids. In an era of terrorism a highly dispersed power system would be most desirable rather than our centralized systems.
What is somewhat astonishing to me is the discovery by Bearden et. al. that time itself is actually compressed energy, and that this free energy is actually coming from the time domain, the ocean of longitudinal EM waves which fill the empty vacuum of spacetime. In fact, time is energy compressed by the same factor that matter is compressed energy: the speed-of-light squared. Thus there is a new companion to Einstein's E=mc2. Can you say "E equals delta-tee-cee-squared?" The "tee" is time and delta-tee is change in time.
A company has been set up to manufacture the MEG called Magnetic Energy Limited.
The ramifications of free energy are enormous. The oil wars are not necessary. If we threw as much money at this technology as we are spending on the oil wars we would be free of the need for oil in less than a decade. With fuel-less cars air pollution will be greatly lessened. Third world nations can raise their standard of living eventually. And the energy is free. And it never runs out.
I have put together a kind of "Bearden for Beginners" article which explains some of the basic concepts of the current state of scalar technology.
http://www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm
The granting of the MEG patent is the herald of the new era of scalar electromagnetics, and the free energy which flows forever and never runs out.
Bill Morgan
Status History of the MEG
updated Oct. 26, 2006Important notes on the status of the MEG (Motionless Electromagnetic Generator)
Since the time this "Scalar Wars" article was written the timetable of the MEG has been thrown off considerably. Bearden had originally said the MEG could be marketed within 1-2 years of receiving funding for final research and scale-up costs. I thought certainly it would not take very long, but over 5 years later they still have not gotten the $10 million or so necessary. There are various reasons for this, some of which Tom Bearden has written about.
The place for updates on the MEG status is Tom Bearden's correspondence section at his website Cheniere.org:
http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/index.html
Here are a few of his reports which detail the history of the MEG status :
Mar. 6, 2006 http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/030206.htm
May 16, 2005 http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/051605.htm
Jan. 19, 2005 http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/011905.htm
Dec. 5, 2004 http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/120504.htm
Do the magnets run down after a while?
Further developments
Tom Bearden clears up a questionWhen the MEG patent was released many questioned the patent language which seemed to imply that permanent magnets of the MEG would "wear out" after awhile. I myself wondered about the same thing so I put the question to Tom, and here is his reply.
Dear Bill,
Thanks for the kind words; much appreciated.
I'm not up to going on radio or TV, and won't be for quite some time. Still suffering from hypoxia, though very slowly improving, and will still be on antibiotics for 10 more months at least (maybe longer).
Obviously an extensive dialog developed between the Patent office and our patent attorneys. As best I can understand it, the Patent office accepts the fact that a permanent magnet produces and emits energy, or has a history of accepting it. They do not appear to be at all cognizant of the broken symmetry of opposite charges, and hence of a dipole. So in their opinion (which seems to be vague), the magnet has to use itself up very gradually, or some such. So some rewrites were essentially required by the Patent office.
All I can say is that a magnet is a very durable thing, so long as you don't heat it up too much or shock it to much. Certainly one will make a good 20 years, and of course there are plenty of magnets that have been around awhile longer.
That said, in our earliest experiments we did "measure" some such effect, or so we thought, until we found that a particular instrument was bad and giving erroneous readings. So with a new instrument, we have not observed since then any such readings.
Out of all that fuzziness came the inclusion of "using up the magnets gradually". So far as we are aware (after correcting those early readings on a defective instrument), we have seen no such measurements or effects since then at all. Nonetheless, just in case there is some very small effect in that respect, at least it's in there.
Actually, as you are aware, capacitors and solid state components are the major concerns for failure, and any system does require maintenance, both periodic and whenever malfunction or failure occurs. The MEG is no different from any other device in that respect, so of course it will have a component failure rate and maintenance required from time to time, just as any other electromagnetic device. But without moving parts, it can be ruggedized and made very durable indeed.
Please give Jeff Rense my regrets, and I do admire his work and his show. He's laying it in there.
The depth of the scientific mindset against COP>1.0 is inexplicable, particularly when physics itself already has COP>1.0 validated experiments (such as Bohren's experiment, which outputs 18 times as much as one inputs by Poynting calculations), and it works every time. Any competent university optics lab can perform the experiment. Also, even the conventional texts admit that a charged capacitor or electret laid on a permanent magnet, so that the E of the cap or electret and the H of the magnet are at right angles, is a "free energy machine". That silly thing will just sit there and pour out Poynting energy S = EXH indefinitely. Years and years and years. If you wait just a single year, that silly thing has changed the energy density of a volume of space a light year in radius, reaching out well beyond the solar system. Now that's a WHALE of a lot of EM energy that beast poured out in that year, and it will still be going strong and pouring it out at a steady rate. The charges and dipoles in original matter in the universe have been pouring out EM energy in that fashion for some 14 billion years, give or take a billion or so. It's also easy to see that, prior to Lorentz's ARBITRARY symmetrical regauging of the Maxwell-Heaviside equations, those equations prescribe both EM systems in equilibrium with their active environment, and EM systems not in equilibrium with it. The latter systems are permitted by the thermodynamics of open disequilibrium systems to perform five magic functions: (1) self-order, (2) self-oscillate or self-rotate, (3) output more energy than the operator inputs (the active environment inputs the rest of it), (4) power itself and its load (the active environment inputs all the energy, like a windmill), and (5) exhibit negentropy. That is a well-established thermodynamics. Lorentz arbitrarily discarded all such open disequilibrium EM systems in order to get simpler equations having analytical solutions and not requiring numerical methods. So he simply scrapped all the really interesting and challenging EM systems in Maxwell's theory. ARBITRARILY!
That our scientific establishment continues to teach only that "half" of the theory, and not point out the rest to the young students, and not fund research into developing such systems that take energy from the vacuum, is simply inexplicable. It's a matter of total dogma, not science at all.
But hopefully it is changing a little bit. At least now we cite chapter and verse when these things were done, and what they are, and the young grad students and post docs can go check the papers and make up their own minds.
That is the real hope of the future: that we get a generation of young fellows, with excellent skills, who now know where all the skeletons got hidden in the closet, and understand that the electrical engineering model arbitrarily assumes an inert vacuum environment (falsified for more than a half century in particle physics) and a local flat spacetime (falsified for nearly a century by general relativity).
Once they know that past history, and go read into what broken symmetry of opposite charges means for a dipole and for all dipolar EM circuits, they will set to and change that more than a century of error. In that case, we shall have numerous solutions to the energy crisis rather quickly, popping up all over.
Good thing. It will certainly displace some great energy barons, but it will also free the populace. One can extract all the EM energy from the vacuum one wishes, anywhere, anytime, with ridiculous ease. One can produce that "electrical wind of energy" at will, by making a simple dipole and then letting it alone. The only energy problem is in how to then intercept some of that energy flow and "catch" it in a circuit, discharge it in a load to power it, and not use half the "caught" energy to kill that dipole that is gushing out the extracted EM energy from the vacuum.
Very best wishes,
Tom Bearden
END
Revised: May 16, 2007
Download this article in Ms Word format
(ScalarWars.doc)
Send a comment to Bill Morgan
See also:
Your comments are welcome: prema@prahlad.org